Gatwick today claimed to be “expansion ready” after revealing a 5.7% rise in August passengers to 4.8 million.
The monthly figure brought the number of annual travellers using the single runway airport up to a record of 42 million.
As Cathay Pacific’s new flights to Hong Kong commenced, long-haul routes at the airport have grown 25% over August 2015, with North Atlantic routes driving this growth with an increase of 51%.
Vancouver saw Gatwick traffic rise by 96%, Montreal by 63%, and Los Angeles by 51%.
Long-haul summer holiday destinations proving popular included Boa Vista, Cape Verde Islands, up 64%; Providenciales, Turks and Caicos Islands, up 42%; and Aruba, up 29%.
Short-haul summer holiday destinations showing the biggest growth were Valencia, up 56%; Tivat, up 56% and Gibraltar, up 50%.
However, European charter traffic was down by 2.8% year-on-year to 286,000 passengers to give a reduced moving annual total of 6.2% to 2.9 million.
Routes to Ireland grew 13% while destinations in the UK and Channel Islands grew 9%, with Belfast International, up 102%; Newquay, up 39% and Inverness, up 18%. Average load factors stood at 91%.
Gatwick chief financial officer, Nick Dunn, said: “Politically, economically and environmentally the case for Gatwick expansion has never been stronger.
“We’re expansion ready - with this summer our busiest ever and the results of our increased investment attracting new airlines including Cathay Pacific’s new route to Hong Kong.”
He added: “Gatwick expansion would secure the same number of new routes and economic benefit Britain needs, can be delivered faster, with dramatically lower environmental impacts, and without the £5 billion of taxpayer funding Heathrow would require for surface access improvements.
“Momentum is with Gatwick as business leaders and politicians continue to unite behind us.
“Post-referendum, Britain needs certainty – Gatwick’s straightforward scheme which can be promptly delivered makes it the only choice.”
This is a community-moderated forum.
All post are the individual views of the respective commenter and are not the expressed views of Travel Weekly.
By posting your comments you agree to accept our Terms & Conditions.