Laptop ban ‘can be made to work’

Laptop ban ‘can be made to work’

 

Aviation security experts say a laptop ban in aircraft cabins can be made to “work” but needs to be managed carefully.

The immediate threat of a ban on laptops and tablets in cabin bags on flights between Europe and the US was removed yesterday following a meeting of US and EU officials in Brussels. But latest reports suggest US authorities are now considering a worldwide ban. A follow-up meeting between EU and US officials is due early next week.

EasyJet head of security Michael Broster said: “If there is a ban we will make it work.”

He told an aviation law seminar in London hosted by law firm Hill Dickinson: “We will need to manage it. But in the short term there would be some issues at major airports.”

Peter O’Broin, policy manager at the UK Airport Operators Association, said: “If there is a security threat and we need heightened security measures we’ll implement them. We will do whatever we are directed to do.”

But he said: “A ban would need to be managed carefully. Do passengers start putting everything in the hold?”

O’Broin added: “The EU is saying the measures need to be proportionate and based on a specific threat.”

He told the seminar: “We do a good job of aviation security. We have a good record. Security is the number one priority. The challenge is to build a strong passenger experience around that.

“The more comfortable you make passengers [going through security], the more someone who is up to something stands out.”

Matthew Finn, managing director of security firm Augmentiq, agreed security in the sector “is very good”. But he said: “A ban would suggest airport security is incapable of detecting an improvised device in cabin baggage.”

He pointed out: “Invariably, at an airport you go through security checks as an unknown [traveller], but the airline knows who you are. We have the PNR [passenger name record] data. Why aren’t we using the data?”

Finn criticised the low pay and poor employment terms of airport security workers, saying this led to a high turnover of staff.

He blamed “pressure on costs” and said: “Security staff are often on zero-hour contracts and low pay, and career opportunities are often not there. So people bounce out of aviation security quite quickly. There is a high churn rate.”

Detective chief superintendent Scott Wilson of the UK’s National Counter Terrorism Security Office warned: “Aviation is a key target – it creates big headlines. Isis wants a lot of attacks and if they could get a bomb on a plane they would.”

Comments

This is a community-moderated forum.
All post are the individual views of the respective commenter and are not the expressed views of Travel Weekly.
By posting your comments you agree to accept our Terms & Conditions.

More in air