Five top airlines face CAA action over denied delay compensation

Five top airlines face CAA action over denied delay compensation

Five major airlines face enforcement action from the UK aviation regulator for denying passengers the compensation they are legally entitled to for delayed flights.

American Airlines, Emirates, Etihad, Singapore Airlines and Turkish Airlines face action after a Civil Aviation Authority review found each of the airlines to be breaching consumer law.

The CAA estimates that more than 200,000 passengers a year using the airlines could be at risk of missing their onward connection and thereby being delayed by over three hours at their final destination.

The carriers confirmed to the CAA they do not pay compensation to passengers who suffer a delay on the first leg of a flight that causes them to miss a connecting service, so end up arriving at their final destination more than three hours late.

Refusal to pay compensation in these instances fails to meet the legal passenger rights requirements for flight disruption, according to the CAA.

Under European rules, passengers are legally entitled to compensation if they arrive at the final destination of their journey more than three hours late – including if booked on a connecting flight – unless the delay was due to extraordinary circumstances.

These rights apply to any flight departing an EU airport, regardless of the nationality of the airline.

Emirates was highlighted as the most complained about airline for non-payment of compensation for connecting flights, the CAA said, citing its complaint data.

While Turkish Airlines has given their passengers access to an Alternative Dispute Resolution service – designed to ensure they can get quick, independent and binding decisions on their disputes with the airline – none of the other carriers facing enforcement action have joined ADR services.

The regulator is calling on these and all other airlines not using ADR to commit to giving their passengers access to these complaint services as soon as possible.

The CAA has also started enforcement action against Spanish budget carrier Vueling for failing to comply with the minimum standards for care and assistance – including a lack of clear oversight to check passengers are being looked after within the requirements of the law. 

The review looked at the different policies of the top 31 airlines operating in the UK, focusing on four areas: care and assistance during disruption; compensation for missed connections; denied boarding (when passengers are “bumped” from flights); and downgrading (when passengers are downgraded to a lower seat class).

CAA director of consumers and markets, Richard Moriarty, said: “Any disruption to a flight is frustrating for passengers, but delays that cause people to miss connecting flights have a particularly damaging effect on people’s travel plans.

“That’s why there are clear laws in place to make sure passengers that experience this type of disruption are looked after by their airline and compensated when the disruption was in the airline’s control.

“Airlines’ first responsibility should be looking after their passengers, not finding ways in which they can prevent passengers upholding their rights.

“So it’s disappointing to see a small number of airlines continuing to let a number of their passengers down by refusing to pay them the compensation they are entitled to.

“Where we see evidence of passengers systematically being denied their rights, we will not hesitate to take the necessary action to ensure airlines change their policies and their customers get the assistance they are entitled to.”

The CAA’s enforcement action follows a comprehensive review of airline policies for supporting passengers experiencing disruption.

An Emirates spokesman said: “As one of the world’s largest airlines, we comply with all legal requirements and regulations as set by the relevant authorities.

“The way in which the CAA has communicated this issue is both misleading and unprofessional.

“As the CAA is well aware, the recent EU guidelines on EC 261 are not intended to amend the law.

“The issue of EC 261’s application to our flights from the UK involving a stopover in Dubai is currently pending before the Court of Appeal.

“We will rigorously defend our position, and challenge the blanket application of EC 261 to every situation, without consideration of context or the safety of our passengers.

“Emirates, like any responsible airline, puts the safety of our passengers first and to be penalised for this is absurd.

“The safety of our passengers and crew always comes first, and many flight delays are caused by factors that are beyond our control and which are not the airline’s responsibility – such as inclement weather, bird strikes, and airport closures.

“We do everything possible to ensure that any disruption caused to our passengers is minimised. In the event of flight delays or cancellations, we always ensure that our customers are looked after.”

Comments

This is a community-moderated forum.
All post are the individual views of the respective commenter and are not the expressed views of Travel Weekly.
By posting your comments you agree to accept our Terms & Conditions.

More in air