<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>

      <title>Travel Weekly Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/</link>
      <description>Connecting today&apos;s travel industry: news, comment and discussion on travel, tourism and aviation issues</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Lost luggage photo project &apos;is a little odd&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I'll let online photo project <a href="http://www.isthisyourluggage.com/">Is This Your Luggage?</a> speak for itself...<br /><br /><img alt="Is This Your Luggage homepage" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/luggage-hp.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="162" width="350" /><blockquote>I COLLECT LOST LUGGAGE, PHOTOGRAPH IT, AND THEN TRY TO FIND THE OWNERS.<br /><br />IT'S A LITTLE ODD BUT NOT AS ODD AS STAMP COLLECTING, JUST A LITTLE HARDER TO FIND STORAGE SPACE.<br /><br /></blockquote>Reminds me of long-running photo tracing site <a href="http://isthisyou.co.uk/thumb.html">Is This You</a>, only... with luggage. ITYL gets its cases from <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1559411/For-sale-at-auction-your-lost-luggage.html">unclaimed luggage auctions</a>, so it's odd but above board.<br /><br />Click on a case and you'll get a composite photo of its contents, which is where I threw in the towel.<br /><br /><i><a href="http://www.metafilter.com/89544/Its-A-Little-Odd-But-Not-As-Odd-As-Stamp-Collecting">Via Metafilter</a></i><br /> <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/lost-luggage-photo-project-is.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/lost-luggage-photo-project-is.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">baggage</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lost luggage</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">luggage</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>How self-explanatory should Travel Weekly headlines be?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[If you're a consumer, you could be forgiven for looking twice at <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/02/23/33115/keith-richards-to-leave-abta.html">'Keith Richards to leave ABTA'</a>. <br /><br />You'd figure out pretty quickly that it doesn't refer to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Richards">the Rolling Stones guitarist</a>, but the scenario does raise an interesting question for web editors.<br /><br /><img alt="richards.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/richards.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="105" width="328" /><i></i>When we publish stories online, we know our headlines go out 'into the wild' - Google search results, RSS feeds on third-party websites, and so on.<br /><br />And we know that the audience in those places may have less background knowledge than those who habitually pick up the paper or visit the homepage.<br /><br />Indeed, they may have <i>no </i>background knowledge. They may have just searched Google News for 'Keith Richards' and found this:<br /><br /><img alt="Keith Richards search, Google News, February 23 2010" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/richards-2.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="173" width="400" />So what do we do when there's potential ambiguity? Pack more information in to clarify matters, or keep it concise and trade-friendly? <br /><br />For example:<br /><br /><ul><li>ABTA axes professional development role in restructure, <i>or</i><br /></li><li>Keith Richards to leave ABTA<br /></li></ul>Generic headlines can be equally problematic. I ask reporters to avoid lines like <b>'Agents hit out over commission cuts',</b> because out of the context of Travel Weekly that could be any kind of agent protesting against any kind of commission cut. <br /><br /><b>'Travel agents hit out at Operator X commission cuts'</b> is more useful to everyone, consumers and travel industry Googlers alike - but again, it makes the headline on the article page a bit less punchy.<br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/how-self-explanatory-should-tr.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/how-self-explanatory-should-tr.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Admin</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">headlines</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">internet</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">news</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">travelweekly.co.uk</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Virtual Trans-Siberian Railway: It&apos;s all very well, but is it marketing?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Just found, <a href="http://www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2010/february/virtual-trans-siberia">via Creative Review</a>, Google and Russian Railways' <a href="http://www.google.ru/intl/ru/landing/transsib/en.html">virtual version of the Trans-Siberian Railway</a>.<br /><br />Videos (the first embedded below) deliver a real-time window view of the route, while a map tracks progress and a drop-down menu lets you select an appropriate soundtrack.<br /><br />There's also a skip-to location menu on the right, which is a mercy, since the whole thing is some 150 hours long.<br /><br /><object height="295" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dgTFqyIDpQw&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dgTFqyIDpQw&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="295" width="480"></object><br /><br />Creative Review reckons it 'works brilliantly as tourism campaigns go', but does it do more for the <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=vV2&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&amp;q=virtual+trans+siberian+railway&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=">media-marketing echo chamber</a> than it does to bring in tourists? <br /><br />Either way, it's a nice proof-of-concept. <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/virtual-trans-siberian-railway.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/virtual-trans-siberian-railway.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">google</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">marketing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">rail</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">russia</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">trains</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">trans-siberian railway</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">youtube</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Link: The world&apos;s 18 strangest airports</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/transportation/4346192.html">fun feature on unusual airports</a> from Popular Mechanics, though there are a few obvious ones - the sunbather-scraping approach to Saint Maarten is a Youtube staple: <br /><br /><object height="265" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l8KjPNj2jgw&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /></object><div align="center"><object height="265" width="320"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l8KjPNj2jgw&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="265" width="320"></object><br /></div><br />...but the tiny clifftop runway at Saba, Netherlands Antilles, was new to me - and I also had no idea that Saudi Arabia's King Fahd International is 11 square miles bigger than Bahrain.<br /><br />I'm ashamed to say I've only landed at two of these - Hong Kong International and Madeira.<br /><br /><i><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/22/the-worlds-18-strangest-airports/">Via Neatorama</a> - I don't generally read Popular Mechanics...</i><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/link-the-worlds-18-strangest-a.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/link-the-worlds-18-strangest-a.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">airports</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">madeira</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">saint maarten</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">video</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">youtube</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Video: Eurostar boss responds to Christmas breakdowns review</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The results of an independent report on Eurostar's troubled Christmas - six breakdowns thanks to snow and ice - were released yesterday, and with them a video response from&nbsp; chief executive Richard Brown.</p>
<p align="center"><embed height="295" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fpEZrOOnTPM&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></p>
<p><em>The key points...</em></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>0.35</strong> - Acknowledges faults, and apologises.</li>
<li><strong>0.55</strong> - Indicates that he has talked to customers personally.</li>
<li><strong>1.17</strong> - Introduces details of the failings identified in the review, breaking them down into 'passenger care', 'communications' and 'resilience'.</li>
<li>
<p><strong>2.20</strong> - Assures us that the review's recommendations will be carried out.</p></li></ul>
<p>Your thoughts?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/video-eurostar-boss-responds-t.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/video-eurostar-boss-responds-t.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">apologies</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">eurostar</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">marketing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">richard brown</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">video</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">youtube</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The &apos;Facebook Generation&apos; is a generalisation too far</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I removed a bit of a conjouring trick from <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/02/11/33025/facebook-users-shun-high-street-travel-agents-survey.html">our story on Hotel-fairy.com's Facebook poll</a>, which suggests that only 14% of the site's users frequent high-street travel agents.</p>
<p>The poll itself is basically sound. Survey of Facebook users, carried out on Facebook, covering the standard 1,000-person sample size. Fine.</p>
<p>But there's sleight-of-hand in <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/66/articles/537524.php">the press release</a>: 1,000 <strong>Facebook users</strong> become <strong>'the Facebook Generation'</strong>.</p>
<p><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Facebook homepage" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/facebook.jpg" width="300" height="175" />'Generation' is a bit of a fuzzy word, inviting you to assume that what is true of users of a particular website is true of an entire age demographic.</p>
<p>It's also simply the wrong word, since stats indicate that <a href="http://www.istrategylabs.com/2009/01/2009-facebook-demographics-and-statistics-report-276-growth-in-35-54-year-old-users/">Facebook is increasingly multi-generational</a>, and there's no indication that the poll was targeted to a particular age group.</p>
<p>If anything, the assumption should be that only 14% of a fairly broad swath of the UK use high-street agents.</p>
<p>But that doesn't work either, since Facebook has (acc. to <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/04/active-facebook-users-by-country-200904.html">April 09 figures from O'Reilly Research</a>) <strong>18m users in a population of over 60m</strong> - and the very fact that poll respondents are Facebook users means they're the sort of people who are likely to book online. </p>
<p>So why publish the story at all? Well, because the point about Facebook users is useful on its own terms. If you're an agent and you're <strong>considering Facebook as a marketing tool</strong>, figures about its users' buying habits are going to help you make a decision.</p>
<p>Everybody loves a trend story. But sometimes extrapolation just muddies things up.</p>
<p><em>(NB: But it's <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/poll-corner-extrapolation-edit.html">fine if you're honest about it</a>.)</em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/the-facebook-generation-is-a-g.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/the-facebook-generation-is-a-g.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Agents</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">facebook</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">marketing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">polls</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">surveys</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Successful storytelling on Twitter? Read &apos;em and weep...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I reproduce this series of travel tweets <a href="http://twitter.com/Bus2Antarctica">from Bus2Antarctica</a> for two reasons. </p>
<p>One, they tell a good story. </p>
<p>Two, they work despite trashing a few Twitter orthodoxies - it's quick-fire first-person stuff without much engagement.</p>
<p>Storytelling, as you'll have guessed from the post title, is something I never thought Twitter was all that good at. But I followed this eagerly - and although it doesn't relate a very pleasant experience,&nbsp;the sense of camaraderie and relief in the final tweets makes it inspiring as a mini-travelogue. </p>
<p>All comes from <a href="http://www.zacheverson.com/2008/10/30/andrew-evans-wins-travel-journalism-award/">an award-winning journalist</a> (Andrew Evans) who is travelling <a href="http://travel.nationalgeographic.com/travel/bus2antarctica/">to Antarctica by bus for National Geographic</a>.</p>
<p><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Bus2Antarctica tweet one" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bus-1.jpg" width="250" height="112" /></p><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Bus2Antarctica tweet two" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bus-2.jpg" width="250" height="113" /><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Bus2Antarctica tweet three" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bus-3jpg.jpg" width="250" height="116" /><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Bus2Antarctica tweet four" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bus-4.jpg" width="250" height="116" /><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Bus2Antarctica tweet five" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bus-5.jpg" width="250" height="115" /><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Bus2Antarctica tweet six" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bus-6.jpg" width="250" height="114" />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/six-tweets-that-shouldnt-work.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/six-tweets-that-shouldnt-work.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Destinations</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">national geographic</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">twitter</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Poll Corner, Extrapolation Edition: Is it all about efficiency?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In last week's TW homepage poll I asked <i>What do you need more of?</i> - and the results came out like this:<br /><br /><ul><li><b>Staff </b>23%</li><li><b>Sales leads</b> 33%</li><li><b>Hours in the day</b> 44%<br /></li></ul>(Off 132 votes)<br /><br /><img alt="Poll - What do travel agents need more of?" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/poll-1.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="400" height="85" />So... if we extrapolated from this, we might conclude that the trade needs to work on efficiency rather than marketing and customer acquisition.<br /><br />Does that picture ring any bells? Or does travelweekly.co.uk just have a readership of fiercely independent grafters? <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/poll-corner-extrapolation-edit.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/poll-corner-extrapolation-edit.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">completely unscientific</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">marketing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">poll</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">travel agents</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Globes 2010: Did consumers and travel agents agree?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I've been waist-deep in Globe Travel Awards 2010 content since 6.30 on Tuesday evening - <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/20/32852/globe-travel-awards-2010-the-winners-in-full.html">winners lists</a>, <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/20/32854/video-the-globe-travel-awards-2010-in-two-minutes.html">videos</a>, <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/travelhub/media/globes_2010_the_winners/default.aspx">photo galleries</a>, the whole nine e-yards.</p>
<p>As I did <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/globes-the-categories-travel-a.html">last year</a>, I'm rounding off with a&nbsp;quick look at the points where our supplier awards and the Associated Newspapers-sponsored Consumer Awards overlap...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Favourite Cruise Company</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> P&amp;O Cruises</li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Fred Olsen, Royal Caribbean, Silversea and Hurtigruten</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Favourite Airline</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Virgin Atlantic</li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Voted Virgin Atlantic best scheduled airline to US/Canada</li></ul>
<p><em>Emirates, BA and Monarch took the other categories.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Best Rail Operator</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Virgin Trains </li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Eurostar</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Favourite Hotel Chain</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Holiday Inn </li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> RIU Hotels</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>European short break provider</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers</strong>: Eurostar </li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Thomas Cook</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Long-Haul Operator</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Kuoni</li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Kuoni</li></ul>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/globes-2010-did-consumers-and.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/globes-2010-did-consumers-and.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Events</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">consumers</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">globe travel awards</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Peaks period crowdsourcing: If we built it, would you come?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>With a couple of our stories pointing <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/07/32752/peaks-period-agents-cautiously-optimistic-about-summer.html">to guarded optimism from travel agents</a>&nbsp;at the start of 2010, this week's homepage poll wrote itself: a simple 'Here's what we've heard - but how are things with you?' job.&nbsp;</p>
<p><img style="margin: 0px auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" class="mt-image-center" alt="Peaks period poll on Travel Weekly" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/poll.jpg" height="120" width="350" />As <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/07/32755/comment-is-confidence-returning-to-the-travel-market.html">Robin said in Friday's comment piece</a>, we can't know how the peaks period has gone until proper numbers start coming in a few weeks down the line.</p>
<p>But we do know that, even as Travel Weekly goes to print and people start opening the digital book, the picture is slowly becoming clearer.</p>
<p>So a situation like the peaks period is particularly interesting and challenging to web editors. It cries out to be covered 'live', but&nbsp;there's no event to focus attention - as there is when, say, the BBC does <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/8424933.stm">live text coverage of a test match</a>.</p>
<p>I'm reminded of Farmers Weekly, who were across the hall at TW's old publishing house. Their equivalent is the annual harvest, and last year they invited readers to anonymously&nbsp;submit their location and progress. All that went into <a href="http://www.fwi.co.uk/harvest-highlights/Harvest-Map/">a broad 'heat map'</a> that showed how the harvest was going in each region of the UK.</p>
<p>Problems with that? Of course. It makes demands of readers. Do they have time to submit data to their trade media? Do they <em>want </em>to?</p>
<p>I'm idealistic enough to think the answers to those questions don't have to be 'no', especially when there's a big shared experience involved. </p>
<p>When snow started&nbsp;falling over the UK on December 17, even the most casual Twitter users were adding #uksnow and a postcode to their tweets, and gabbling excitedly about <a href="http://uksnow.benmarsh.co.uk/">Ben Marsh's brilliant snow map</a>. </p>
<p>I had an airport pickup to do the following day, and I'm not kidding when I tell you that was more helpful to me than the BBC and Met combined.</p>
<p>For now, I'm just running a peaks poll - and it's gratifying to see that early results do reflect 'cautious optimism', with 59% seeing good summer sales (winter's a different story). </p>
<p>But could we have done more? If Travel Weekly tried to track the peaks period with your help, would you participate? </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/peaks-period-crowdsourcing-if.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/peaks-period-crowdsourcing-if.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Admin</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">data</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">journalism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">peaks period</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">sales</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">summer holidays</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">travel weekly</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Holiday Options failure: reaction on Twitter</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/11/18/32433/holiday-options-goes-bust.html">Holiday Options has gone bust</a>, and some of the reaction we've started to see testifies to the esteem in which the operator was held by agents.</p>
<p>This is just to aggregate some of the tweets I've spotted - I'm not using a feed as the keyword &nbsp;'Holiday Options' is likely to pull in a lot of generic travel posts.</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>Holiday Options has gone bust. Shame.<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/lisaminot">@lisaminot</a></p>
<p>RT @lisaminot Holiday Options has gone bust... shame &gt; Agree. They had nice program 2 interesting dests like Croatia, Azores, Slovenia, etc<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/alastairmck">@alastairmck</a></p>
<p>bit slow on the uptake but just been told Holiday Options has gone into administration. Shame, really nice company.<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/steveody">@steveody</a></p>
<p>Oh dear, another bites the dust, so sad.<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/lynnerosie">@lynnerosie</a></p>
<p>"A big shame about Holiday Options, many satisfied customers over the years. Who now for Croatia? Not many specialists left to sell"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/selectworld">@selectworld</a></p>
<p>"Can anyone say what's happening with Hidden Croatia? ... Sad, as both v nice to deal with"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/catherinemurp">@catherinemurp</a></p>
<p>"Sad about Holiday Options failure, I quite liked them"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/juliedurrans">@juliedurrans</a></p>
<p>"Can't believe that Holiday Options has gone under!"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/baldwinstravel">@baldwinstravel</a></p></blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/holiday-options-failure-reacti.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/holiday-options-failure-reacti.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Operators</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">administration</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">holiday options</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Tested: Bing &apos;visual search&apos; of travel destinations</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Bing UK created a good <a href="http://www.bing.com/visualsearch?q=UK+Prime+Ministers&amp;g=uk_prime_ministers&amp;FORM=pgbar1">visual search of prime ministers</a> for the state opening of Parliament today (you'll need to install Silverlight) - and it turns out there's <a href="http://www.bing.com/visualsearch?q=Travel+destinations&amp;g=travel_destinations&amp;FORM=Z9GE">one for travel destinations too</a>.</p>
<p><em>(Visual Search isn't an open-ended tool at this stage, there are just a handful of galleries that Bing has developed itself.)</em></p>
<p>It's a story best told with screengrabs:</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="226" alt="Bing visual search gallery for travel destinations - screen one" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bing-travel-1.jpg" width="400" />So the first big problem is picture selection. While there are obvious ways to visually differentiate UK prime ministers (their faces) it isn't always&nbsp;that simple with travel. The enlarged section is&nbsp;the thumbnail for&nbsp;Hawai'i's Big Island. A clear visual clue? Not to me.</p>
<p>We drill down using category filters on the left, again enlarged, and get a flat gallery with some text cues. (You can also move up or down in the taxonomy by hovering over an image, which opens up a little sub-menu.)</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="218" alt="Bing visual search gallery for travel destinations - screen two" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bing-travel-2.jpg" width="400" /></p>
<p>Subsequent screens resemble this one, but with fewer 'results' as you refine your 'search'. </p>
<p>I use scare quotes because, as I said, this is a static gallery and not a true search tool - but it <em>leads </em>to true search results, because the endpoint of this process is a page of standard Bing results for the image you clicked on.</p>
<p>Hit the thumbnail for Bath, UK, and you'll get...</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="211" alt="Bing visual search gallery for travel destinations - screen three" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bing-travel-3.jpg" width="400" /></p>
<p>...<a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=Bath+England&amp;form=SGEWEB&amp;adlt=strict">organic search results for Bath, UK</a>.</p>
<p>Clearly this is experimental, and it's a nice interface. I'm sure there are some more sophisticated ways it could work in the travel market - 'destinations' is after all as broad as it gets...</p>
<p><em>Twitterthanks:&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/alisongow/status/5822877410">@alisongow</a>, who retweeted&nbsp;the UK PMs gallery from MSN UK executive producer <a href="http://twitter.com/PeterBale/status/5822809145">@peterbale</a>.</em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/tested-bing-visual-search-of-t.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/tested-bing-visual-search-of-t.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">bing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">microsoft</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">msn</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">search</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">visual search</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Travel sites are poor at it; Google may start valuing it. Problem?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Neither of these is hot off the press, but it is worth putting them side by side.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.travolution.co.uk/articles/2009/11/13/3014/top-travel-sites-show-poor-load-times.html">Top travel sites show poor load times</a> [Travolution]</li>
<li><a href="http://searchengineland.com/site-speed-googles-next-ranking-factor-29793">Site speed: Google's next ranking factor</a> [Search Engine Land]</li></ul>
<p>The latter refers to organic search results - i.e. the 'proper' results, not the paid-for slots right at the top or over at the side.</p>
<p>Big deal?&nbsp;Well, Google only said they <em>may </em>start using site speed, and Search Engine Land goes on to say:</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>If I had to guess, page speed would not be a tremendously weighed factor, unless the site takes 90 seconds to load</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">...and the worst load time in the Gomez study that Travolution reported was 30 seconds. So this isn't going to bring anybody's business down. </p>
<p dir="ltr">But every little helps, and&nbsp;a quick load time is important regardless of SEO impact.</p>
<p dir="ltr">For those who want to improve, econsultancy wrote a quick guide to <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/4973-load-time-coming-soon-as-a-google-ranking-factor">some of the issues that impact load time</a> in the wake of the Google story.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/travel-sites-are-poor-at-it-go.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/travel-sites-are-poor-at-it-go.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">google</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">load time</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">search</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">site speed</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The point of blogs: A reply to our own columnist...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I don't flatter myself that readers pore over our Thursday email alerts in search of contradictions.</p>
<p>But if you were so minded, you would have spotted this today:</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="103" alt="maureen.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/maureen.jpg" width="400" />On the left, <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/11/05/32291/maureen-whats-the-point-of-blogs-answers-on-a-postcard.html">our travel agent columnist decrying blogging</a>; on the right, five posts from <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2008/07/30/28308/twgroup-blogs.html">Travel Weekly bloggers</a>.</p>
<p>A&nbsp;contributing columnist and a web editor are not obliged to&nbsp;agree, of course. And we don't.</p>
<p>While I don't know the family Maureen is writing about, it strikes me that&nbsp;you could take the same scenario and give it a&nbsp;positive reading. Like so:</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>A couple go on a road trip. Travel excites them so much that they want to document it.&nbsp;They write and post photos,&nbsp;which allows the family and friends left behind to feel closer to them. This seems to work,&nbsp;because their parents knew what they're up to, share their enthusiasm and want to pass it on.&nbsp;A bit annoying, but heigh-ho - we all know what Proud Parents are like.</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">For me, the main misapprehension in Maureen's piece is that bloggers expect everyone to read their every word. I don't know a single one that does (and I know a lot).</p>
<p dir="ltr">Did any TW Blog readers see the column? Thoughts?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/the-point-of-blogs-a-reply-to.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/the-point-of-blogs-a-reply-to.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">blogging</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">blogs</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">maureen</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>WTM Steps: A pedometer contest for the Twitterati</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There'll be loads of online travel types <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/08/31986/world-travel-market-2009-page.html">at World Travel Market</a>, and <em>everyone </em>ends up walking a ridiculous distance. So I'm suggesting an informal contest.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="200" alt="091104--trainers-water.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/091104--trainers-water.jpg" width="300" />Get yourself a pedometer - there may still be time to nab one of the <a href="http://www.justgiving.com/wtm2009">Just&nbsp;A Drop charity ones</a> - and keep track of how far you've walked.</p>
<p>Then tweet it with the hashtag <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23wtmsteps">#wtmsteps</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li>Post daily stats if you want - some folks are only there for one day</li>
<li>Post a final total on Friday</li></ul>
<p>I'm fully expecting to lose, since I'll be in Travel Weekly's goldfish-bowl press room (UKI2155)&nbsp;most of the time...</p>
<p><em>Oh - the winner gets the admiration of their peers and stronger calf muscles.</em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/wtm-steps-a-pedometer-contest.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/wtm-steps-a-pedometer-contest.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Events</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">world travel market</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">wtm</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
