<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<icon>http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/favicon.ico</icon>
   <title>Travel Weekly Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2010:/blogs//11</id>
   <updated>2010-02-01T12:44:04Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Connecting today&apos;s travel industry: news, comment and discussion on travel, tourism and aviation issues</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.32-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Poll Corner, Extrapolation Edition: Is it all about efficiency?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/02/poll-corner-extrapolation-edit.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2010:/blogs//11.119951</id>
   
   <published>2010-02-01T12:08:11Z</published>
   <updated>2010-02-01T12:44:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In last week&apos;s TW homepage poll I asked What do you need more of? - and the results came out like this:Staff 23%Sales leads 33%Hours in the day 44%(Off 132 votes)So... if we extrapolated from this, we might conclude that...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="103512" label="completely unscientific" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1700" label="marketing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6500" label="poll" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25592" label="travel agents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[In last week's TW homepage poll I asked <i>What do you need more of?</i> - and the results came out like this:<br /><br /><ul><li><b>Staff </b>23%</li><li><b>Sales leads</b> 33%</li><li><b>Hours in the day</b> 44%<br /></li></ul>(Off 132 votes)<br /><br /><img alt="Poll - What do travel agents need more of?" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/poll-1.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="400" height="85" />So... if we extrapolated from this, we might conclude that the trade needs to work on efficiency rather than marketing and customer acquisition.<br /><br />Does that picture ring any bells? Or does travelweekly.co.uk just have a readership of fiercely independent grafters? <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Globes 2010: Did consumers and travel agents agree?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/globes-2010-did-consumers-and.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2010:/blogs//11.118225</id>
   
   <published>2010-01-22T15:05:37Z</published>
   <updated>2010-01-22T15:51:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I've been waist-deep in Globe Travel Awards 2010 content since 6.30 on Tuesday evening - winners lists, videos, photo galleries, the whole nine e-yards. As I did last year, I'm rounding off with a&nbsp;quick look at the points where our...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Events" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="4161" label="consumers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="71739" label="globe travel awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I've been waist-deep in Globe Travel Awards 2010 content since 6.30 on Tuesday evening - <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/20/32852/globe-travel-awards-2010-the-winners-in-full.html">winners lists</a>, <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/20/32854/video-the-globe-travel-awards-2010-in-two-minutes.html">videos</a>, <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/travelhub/media/globes_2010_the_winners/default.aspx">photo galleries</a>, the whole nine e-yards.</p>
<p>As I did <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/globes-the-categories-travel-a.html">last year</a>, I'm rounding off with a&nbsp;quick look at the points where our supplier awards and the Associated Newspapers-sponsored Consumer Awards overlap...</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Favourite Cruise Company</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> P&amp;O Cruises</li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Fred Olsen, Royal Caribbean, Silversea and Hurtigruten</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Favourite Airline</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Virgin Atlantic</li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Voted Virgin Atlantic best scheduled airline to US/Canada</li></ul>
<p><em>Emirates, BA and Monarch took the other categories.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Best Rail Operator</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Virgin Trains </li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Eurostar</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Favourite Hotel Chain</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Holiday Inn </li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> RIU Hotels</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>European short break provider</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers</strong>: Eurostar </li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Thomas Cook</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><u>Long-Haul Operator</u></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Consumers:</strong> Kuoni</li>
<li><strong>Agents:</strong> Kuoni</li></ul>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Peaks period crowdsourcing: If we built it, would you come?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2010/01/peaks-period-crowdsourcing-if.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2010:/blogs//11.91811</id>
   
   <published>2010-01-11T17:02:43Z</published>
   <updated>2010-01-11T22:26:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[With a couple of our stories pointing to guarded optimism from travel agents&nbsp;at the start of 2010, this week's homepage poll wrote itself: a simple 'Here's what we've heard - but how are things with you?' job.&nbsp; As Robin said...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Admin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="11673" label="data" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13611" label="journalism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="101480" label="peaks period" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2457" label="sales" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="51280" label="summer holidays" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16290" label="travel weekly" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p>With a couple of our stories pointing <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/07/32752/peaks-period-agents-cautiously-optimistic-about-summer.html">to guarded optimism from travel agents</a>&nbsp;at the start of 2010, this week's homepage poll wrote itself: a simple 'Here's what we've heard - but how are things with you?' job.&nbsp;</p>
<p><img style="margin: 0px auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" class="mt-image-center" alt="Peaks period poll on Travel Weekly" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/poll.jpg" height="120" width="350" />As <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2010/01/07/32755/comment-is-confidence-returning-to-the-travel-market.html">Robin said in Friday's comment piece</a>, we can't know how the peaks period has gone until proper numbers start coming in a few weeks down the line.</p>
<p>But we do know that, even as Travel Weekly goes to print and people start opening the digital book, the picture is slowly becoming clearer.</p>
<p>So a situation like the peaks period is particularly interesting and challenging to web editors. It cries out to be covered 'live', but&nbsp;there's no event to focus attention - as there is when, say, the BBC does <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/8424933.stm">live text coverage of a test match</a>.</p>
<p>I'm reminded of Farmers Weekly, who were across the hall at TW's old publishing house. Their equivalent is the annual harvest, and last year they invited readers to anonymously&nbsp;submit their location and progress. All that went into <a href="http://www.fwi.co.uk/harvest-highlights/Harvest-Map/">a broad 'heat map'</a> that showed how the harvest was going in each region of the UK.</p>
<p>Problems with that? Of course. It makes demands of readers. Do they have time to submit data to their trade media? Do they <em>want </em>to?</p>
<p>I'm idealistic enough to think the answers to those questions don't have to be 'no', especially when there's a big shared experience involved. </p>
<p>When snow started&nbsp;falling over the UK on December 17, even the most casual Twitter users were adding #uksnow and a postcode to their tweets, and gabbling excitedly about <a href="http://uksnow.benmarsh.co.uk/">Ben Marsh's brilliant snow map</a>. </p>
<p>I had an airport pickup to do the following day, and I'm not kidding when I tell you that was more helpful to me than the BBC and Met combined.</p>
<p>For now, I'm just running a peaks poll - and it's gratifying to see that early results do reflect 'cautious optimism', with 59% seeing good summer sales (winter's a different story). </p>
<p>But could we have done more? If Travel Weekly tried to track the peaks period with your help, would you participate? </p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Holiday Options failure: reaction on Twitter</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/holiday-options-failure-reacti.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.78029</id>
   
   <published>2009-11-18T16:45:58Z</published>
   <updated>2009-11-18T18:29:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Holiday Options has gone bust, and some of the reaction we&apos;ve started to see testifies to the esteem in which the operator was held by agents. This is just to aggregate some of the tweets I&apos;ve spotted - I&apos;m not...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Operators" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="12455" label="administration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50826" label="failures" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="98102" label="holiday options" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/11/18/32433/holiday-options-goes-bust.html">Holiday Options has gone bust</a>, and some of the reaction we've started to see testifies to the esteem in which the operator was held by agents.</p>
<p>This is just to aggregate some of the tweets I've spotted - I'm not using a feed as the keyword &nbsp;'Holiday Options' is likely to pull in a lot of generic travel posts.</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>Holiday Options has gone bust. Shame.<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/lisaminot">@lisaminot</a></p>
<p>RT @lisaminot Holiday Options has gone bust... shame &gt; Agree. They had nice program 2 interesting dests like Croatia, Azores, Slovenia, etc<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/alastairmck">@alastairmck</a></p>
<p>bit slow on the uptake but just been told Holiday Options has gone into administration. Shame, really nice company.<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/steveody">@steveody</a></p>
<p>Oh dear, another bites the dust, so sad.<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/lynnerosie">@lynnerosie</a></p>
<p>"A big shame about Holiday Options, many satisfied customers over the years. Who now for Croatia? Not many specialists left to sell"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/selectworld">@selectworld</a></p>
<p>"Can anyone say what's happening with Hidden Croatia? ... Sad, as both v nice to deal with"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/catherinemurp">@catherinemurp</a></p>
<p>"Sad about Holiday Options failure, I quite liked them"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/juliedurrans">@juliedurrans</a></p>
<p>"Can't believe that Holiday Options has gone under!"<br /><a href="http://twitter.com/baldwinstravel">@baldwinstravel</a></p></blockquote>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Tested: Bing &apos;visual search&apos; of travel destinations</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/tested-bing-visual-search-of-t.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.77825</id>
   
   <published>2009-11-18T10:27:54Z</published>
   <updated>2009-11-18T11:23:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Bing UK created a good visual search of prime ministers for the state opening of Parliament today (you&apos;ll need to install Silverlight) - and it turns out there&apos;s one for travel destinations too. (Visual Search isn&apos;t an open-ended tool at...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="18456" label="bing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1094" label="microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="15563" label="msn" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="728" label="search" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="98057" label="visual search" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Bing UK created a good <a href="http://www.bing.com/visualsearch?q=UK+Prime+Ministers&amp;g=uk_prime_ministers&amp;FORM=pgbar1">visual search of prime ministers</a> for the state opening of Parliament today (you'll need to install Silverlight) - and it turns out there's <a href="http://www.bing.com/visualsearch?q=Travel+destinations&amp;g=travel_destinations&amp;FORM=Z9GE">one for travel destinations too</a>.</p>
<p><em>(Visual Search isn't an open-ended tool at this stage, there are just a handful of galleries that Bing has developed itself.)</em></p>
<p>It's a story best told with screengrabs:</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="226" alt="Bing visual search gallery for travel destinations - screen one" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bing-travel-1.jpg" width="400" />So the first big problem is picture selection. While there are obvious ways to visually differentiate UK prime ministers (their faces) it isn't always&nbsp;that simple with travel. The enlarged section is&nbsp;the thumbnail for&nbsp;Hawai'i's Big Island. A clear visual clue? Not to me.</p>
<p>We drill down using category filters on the left, again enlarged, and get a flat gallery with some text cues. (You can also move up or down in the taxonomy by hovering over an image, which opens up a little sub-menu.)</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="218" alt="Bing visual search gallery for travel destinations - screen two" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bing-travel-2.jpg" width="400" /></p>
<p>Subsequent screens resemble this one, but with fewer 'results' as you refine your 'search'. </p>
<p>I use scare quotes because, as I said, this is a static gallery and not a true search tool - but it <em>leads </em>to true search results, because the endpoint of this process is a page of standard Bing results for the image you clicked on.</p>
<p>Hit the thumbnail for Bath, UK, and you'll get...</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="211" alt="Bing visual search gallery for travel destinations - screen three" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/bing-travel-3.jpg" width="400" /></p>
<p>...<a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=Bath+England&amp;form=SGEWEB&amp;adlt=strict">organic search results for Bath, UK</a>.</p>
<p>Clearly this is experimental, and it's a nice interface. I'm sure there are some more sophisticated ways it could work in the travel market - 'destinations' is after all as broad as it gets...</p>
<p><em>Twitterthanks:&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/alisongow/status/5822877410">@alisongow</a>, who retweeted&nbsp;the UK PMs gallery from MSN UK executive producer <a href="http://twitter.com/PeterBale/status/5822809145">@peterbale</a>.</em></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Travel sites are poor at it; Google may start valuing it. Problem?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/travel-sites-are-poor-at-it-go.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.77265</id>
   
   <published>2009-11-16T17:05:59Z</published>
   <updated>2009-11-16T17:40:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Neither of these is hot off the press, but it is worth putting them side by side. Top travel sites show poor load times [Travolution] Site speed: Google&apos;s next ranking factor [Search Engine Land] The latter refers to organic search...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="3543" label="google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="97913" label="load time" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="728" label="search" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="97915" label="site speed" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Neither of these is hot off the press, but it is worth putting them side by side.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.travolution.co.uk/articles/2009/11/13/3014/top-travel-sites-show-poor-load-times.html">Top travel sites show poor load times</a> [Travolution]</li>
<li><a href="http://searchengineland.com/site-speed-googles-next-ranking-factor-29793">Site speed: Google's next ranking factor</a> [Search Engine Land]</li></ul>
<p>The latter refers to organic search results - i.e. the 'proper' results, not the paid-for slots right at the top or over at the side.</p>
<p>Big deal?&nbsp;Well, Google only said they <em>may </em>start using site speed, and Search Engine Land goes on to say:</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>If I had to guess, page speed would not be a tremendously weighed factor, unless the site takes 90 seconds to load</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">...and the worst load time in the Gomez study that Travolution reported was 30 seconds. So this isn't going to bring anybody's business down. </p>
<p dir="ltr">But every little helps, and&nbsp;a quick load time is important regardless of SEO impact.</p>
<p dir="ltr">For those who want to improve, econsultancy wrote a quick guide to <a href="http://econsultancy.com/blog/4973-load-time-coming-soon-as-a-google-ranking-factor">some of the issues that impact load time</a> in the wake of the Google story.&nbsp;</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The point of blogs: A reply to our own columnist...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/the-point-of-blogs-a-reply-to.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.75093</id>
   
   <published>2009-11-05T17:23:03Z</published>
   <updated>2009-11-06T11:57:37Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I don&apos;t flatter myself that readers pore over our Thursday email alerts in search of contradictions. But if you were so minded, you would have spotted this today: On the left, our travel agent columnist decrying blogging; on the right,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="63" label="blogging" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="564" label="blogs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="88852" label="maureen" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I don't flatter myself that readers pore over our Thursday email alerts in search of contradictions.</p>
<p>But if you were so minded, you would have spotted this today:</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="103" alt="maureen.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/maureen.jpg" width="400" />On the left, <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/11/05/32291/maureen-whats-the-point-of-blogs-answers-on-a-postcard.html">our travel agent columnist decrying blogging</a>; on the right, five posts from <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2008/07/30/28308/twgroup-blogs.html">Travel Weekly bloggers</a>.</p>
<p>A&nbsp;contributing columnist and a web editor are not obliged to&nbsp;agree, of course. And we don't.</p>
<p>While I don't know the family Maureen is writing about, it strikes me that&nbsp;you could take the same scenario and give it a&nbsp;positive reading. Like so:</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>A couple go on a road trip. Travel excites them so much that they want to document it.&nbsp;They write and post photos,&nbsp;which allows the family and friends left behind to feel closer to them. This seems to work,&nbsp;because their parents knew what they're up to, share their enthusiasm and want to pass it on.&nbsp;A bit annoying, but heigh-ho - we all know what Proud Parents are like.</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">For me, the main misapprehension in Maureen's piece is that bloggers expect everyone to read their every word. I don't know a single one that does (and I know a lot).</p>
<p dir="ltr">Did any TW Blog readers see the column? Thoughts?</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>WTM Steps: A pedometer contest for the Twitterati</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/wtm-steps-a-pedometer-contest.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.74942</id>
   
   <published>2009-11-04T16:43:35Z</published>
   <updated>2009-11-04T17:03:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[There'll be loads of online travel types at World Travel Market, and everyone ends up walking a ridiculous distance. So I'm suggesting an informal contest. &nbsp; Get yourself a pedometer - there may still be time to nab one of...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Events" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="26499" label="world travel market" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1184" label="wtm" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There'll be loads of online travel types <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/08/31986/world-travel-market-2009-page.html">at World Travel Market</a>, and <em>everyone </em>ends up walking a ridiculous distance. So I'm suggesting an informal contest.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="200" alt="091104--trainers-water.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/091104--trainers-water.jpg" width="300" />Get yourself a pedometer - there may still be time to nab one of the <a href="http://www.justgiving.com/wtm2009">Just&nbsp;A Drop charity ones</a> - and keep track of how far you've walked.</p>
<p>Then tweet it with the hashtag <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23wtmsteps">#wtmsteps</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li>Post daily stats if you want - some folks are only there for one day</li>
<li>Post a final total on Friday</li></ul>
<p>I'm fully expecting to lose, since I'll be in Travel Weekly's goldfish-bowl press room (UKI2155)&nbsp;most of the time...</p>
<p><em>Oh - the winner gets the admiration of their peers and stronger calf muscles.</em></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Heathrow on Twitter: a great start, but will it scale?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/ok---heathrow-is-24.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.72922</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-23T10:38:29Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-23T14:27:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Ok - Heathrow is some 24 hours in to Twitter, and already there&apos;s a strong interaction to flag up:@seany85 said that Terminal 3 stinks:@heathrowairport replied that the facilities team were on the case:@seany85 responded with more details, and mentioned a...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Airlines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="1559" label="airports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9348" label="heathrow" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="727" label="social media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="15145" label="twitter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[Ok - Heathrow is some 24 hours in to Twitter, and already there's a strong interaction to flag up:<br /><br /><a href="http://twitter.com/seany85/status/5092322594">@seany85 said</a> that Terminal 3 stinks:<br /><br /><img alt="091023-heath-1.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/091023-heath-1.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="300" height="37" /><a href="http://twitter.com/HeathrowAirport/status/5092970246">@heathrowairport replied</a> that the facilities team were on the case:<br /><br /><img alt="091023-heath-2.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/091023-heath-2.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="300" height="42" /><a href="http://twitter.com/seany85/status/5093103898">@seany85 responded</a> with more details, and mentioned a job interview.<br /><br /><img alt="091023-heath-3.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/091023-heath-3.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="300" height="42" /><a href="http://twitter.com/HeathrowAirport/status/5093432687">@heathrowairport promised</a> to pass on his comments and wished him luck.<br /><br /><img alt="091023-heath-4.jpg" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/091023-heath-4.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="300" height="40" />Which shows that:<br /><br /><ul><li>Heathrow is using search to monitor mentions (the first message wasn't an @)</li><li>It is replying (sounds simple, doesn't always happen)<br /></li><li>It is replying with <i>details of action</i> - not just platitudes<br /></li></ul>It seems to have missed the difference between 'real' replies and just writing @[username] - meaning it's harder to track back on conversations.<br /><br />That could be an issue with HootSuite, which appears to be the client Heathrow is using - I have no experience of it. Anyone?<br /><br />Otherwise, an impressive start. The problem will be volume. As Heathrow - which <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World%27s_busiest_airport#Other_current_claims">has a claim to be the busiest airport in the world</a> - starts to gain traction and its follower roster swells, it may find it hard to be this attentive to everyone...<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Tourism Concern: Badges, hashtags and supporters online</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/tourism-concern-badges-and-has.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.71995</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-19T10:49:01Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-23T10:13:09Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Last updated 11am October 23Tourism Concern has managed to raise around £17,500 after launching a bid for donations last week.Those of us with a web presence can help spread the word. Here&apos;s a list of supporters online (work in progress),...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="5775" label="charity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="95706" label="tourism concern" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="15145" label="twitter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<i>Last updated 11am October 23<br /><br /></i>Tourism Concern has managed to <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/22/32214/tourism-concern-raises-17500-after-appeal-for-help.html">raise around £17,500</a> after launching <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/19/32158/tourism-concern-launches-appeal-for-survival.html">a bid for donations last week</a>.<br /><br />Those of us with a web presence can help spread the word. Here's a list of supporters online (work in progress), plus tips on trumpeting your support Twitter- or blog-wise.<br /><br /><b>Supporters<br /></b><br />Drop me <a href="mailto:nathan.midgley@travelweekly.co.uk">an email</a>, @ or DM me if you want in on the list.<br /><br /><ul><li>Graham Robertson | <a href="http://projectwander.com/">Project: Wander</a> | <a href="http://twitter.com/grayum_ian">@grayum_ian</a></li><li>Karen Simmonds | <a href="http://www.travelmatters.co.uk/">Travel Matters</a> | <a href="http://twitter.com/KarenSimmonds">@karensimmonds</a></li><li>Debbie Hindle | <a href="http://www.bgb.co.uk/">BGB</a> | <a href="http://twitter.com/bgbcomms">@bgbcomms</a><br /></li><li>Me | (<a href="http://twitter.com/twblog">@twblog</a>)</li></ul><br /><b>Are there badges?</b><br /><br />Not as such. Tourism Concern doesn't provide badges for members, but is happy for <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/assets_c/2009/10/tourism-concern-thumb-240x240-50493.jpg">its logo</a> (jpg, 17k) to be used under the circumstances below.<br /><br /><ul><li>Link it to their website</li><li>Use the wording '[Site] supports/is a supporter of...'</li></ul>Here's a version on <a href="http://projectwander.com/">Project: Wander</a>:<br /><br /><img alt="Project Wander - Tourism Concern badge" src="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/091019-pj-tc-logo.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" width="300" height="160" /><b><br />...a hashtag?</b><br /><br />If you're on Twitter, let other Tourism Concern supporters know what you're up to using the tag <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23savetourismconcern">#savetourismconcern</a>.<b><br /></b>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Trivia: Why Namibia tourism affects the study of our brains</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/namib.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.70728</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-15T22:14:27Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-15T21:41:02Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Out in Namibia, tourism is among the factors influencing changes to the language of the Himba people, particularly their unusually low number of colour terms (they have five, while most major languages have 11).The unlikely victim is psychology. Psychologists have...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Destinations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="95443" label="himba" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="8411" label="namibia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="19668" label="psychology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="315" label="science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25129" label="trivia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[Out in Namibia, tourism is among the factors influencing changes to the language of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himba">Himba</a> people, particularly their unusually low number of colour terms (they have five, while most major languages have 11).<br /><br />The unlikely victim is psychology. Psychologists have <a href="http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb05/hues.html">done comparative studies</a> of how Himba and non-Himba infants develop an understanding of colour, and drawn conclusions about how much language influences the way human beings think. As the differences are eroded, the scope for research diminishes.<br /><br />Not something that belongs on the top of the industry's agenda, obviously, but an interesting nugget. I'm indebted to my girlfriend for it - she's off to Namibia do a study on the Himba in November.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>When synergy attacks: Ambi Pur meets National Geographic</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/when-synergy-attacks-ambi-pur.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.70924</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-13T22:42:03Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-13T23:09:10Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Weirdest travel-related tie-in of the year? Ambi Pur has tied up with National Geographic to release a range of air fresheners &apos;inspired by the world&apos;.They are, since you ask,Japan Tatami, inspired by the fresh soothing aroma that comes from authentic...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="95251" label="ambi pur" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10787" label="brands" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="33072" label="graham donoghue" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1700" label="marketing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="95252" label="national geographic" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[Weirdest travel-related tie-in of the year? Ambi Pur has <a href="http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/news/923022/Ambi-Pur-backs-National-Geographic-link-61m-marketing-drive/">tied up with National Geographic</a> to release a range of air fresheners 'inspired by the world'.<br /><br />They are, since you ask,<br /><blockquote>Japan Tatami, inspired by the fresh soothing aroma that comes from
authentic Japanese Tatami mats, and Nevada Desert Flower, inspired by a
rare flower that only has a chance to blossom after heavy winter rain
in the Nevada Desert.<br /></blockquote>These are unlikely to put in an appearance at Midgley Mansions. Maybe one for kookier travel agencies? Do let me know if you decide to hit clients with a whiff of Tatami mat.<br /><br />PS: Smell was a component of <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2007/11/29/26034/holiday-bookers-to-use-star-trek-style-holodecks.html">the 'holiday holodeck'</a> once floated by then TUI new media director (now travelsupermarket.com boss) Graham Donoghue... so it could be Ambi Pur and NG are just waaay ahead of the curve on this one. Or, um, not.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Are TW and its readers still &apos;predictable&apos; over Ryanair?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/are-tw-and-its-readers-still-p.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.70732</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-13T09:00:05Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-13T08:06:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Twitter hosted some inevitable chatter about the Panorama show on Ryanair.Former Travolution editor Kevin May, never terribly sympathetic to the traditional bad blood between travel agents and Ryanair, tweeted: utterly predictable responses from press and readers every time ryanair mentionedJustified?...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Admin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Airlines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="156" label="bbc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="672" label="media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10566" label="pr" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2740" label="ryanair" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16290" label="travel weekly" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="70046" label="ttg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[Twitter hosted some inevitable chatter about the Panorama show on Ryanair.<br /><br />Former Travolution editor Kevin May, <a href="http://www.travolution.co.uk/blog/2009/02/anger-over-ryanair-costa-deal.php">never terribly sympathetic</a> to the traditional bad blood between travel agents and Ryanair, <a href="http://twitter.com/kevinlukemay/status/4817678768">tweeted</a>:<br /><br />
<blockquote>
<p>utterly predictable responses from press and readers every time ryanair mentioned</p></blockquote>Justified? On this occasion, I don't think so - we ran a straight-up-and-down story on <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/12/32106/ryanair-slams-bbc-over-panorama-hatchet-job.html">the spat between Ryanair and the BBC</a>, and <a href="http://www.ttglive.com/c/portal/layout?p_l_id=61139&amp;CMPI_SHARED_articleId=3147514&amp;CMPI_SHARED_ImageArticleId=3147514&amp;CMPI_SHARED_articleIdRelated=3147514&amp;CMPI_SHARED_ToolsArticleId=3147514&amp;CMPI_SHARED_CommentArticleId=3147514&amp;articleTitle=Ryanair%20in%20row%20over%20BBC%20%27hatchet%20job%27">TTG did the same</a>. Theirs generated (at time of writing) only three comments, two of them pro-Ryanair.<br /><br />But yes, in the past&nbsp;we've probably been too ready&nbsp;to stir up the antipathy we know many agents feel/felt.<br /><br />For the record, my impression was that our readers had figured out Ryanair's game plan and were tired of the airline getting undue prominence in the media - I can well remember the fatigue and cynicism that greeted <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/ryanair-looking-at-possibly-ma.html">the 'pay to pee' story.</a><br /><br />The punchline? As a result, I placed the Ryanair/BBC story at the bottom of yesterday's email news alert... only to find it became comfortably the most-read article.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Olympic Games spur hotel growth... BRIC by BRIC</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/olympic-games-spur-hotel-growt.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.70731</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-12T22:51:39Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-12T23:20:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The Times business section has a small story about the London Olympic Games spurring hotel development*:The British Hospitality Association&apos;s trends and developments report says that 40k rooms are due on stream by 2015 ... the Olympics are &apos;an incentive to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Hotels" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="57003" label="beijing olympics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="400" label="brazil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="65474" label="bric" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="73" label="china" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="57004" label="london 2012" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2944" label="olympics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="95132" label="rio de janeiro" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="576" label="times" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[The Times business section has a small story about the <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/leisure/article6870160.ece">London Olympic Games spurring hotel development</a>*:<br /><br /><blockquote>The British Hospitality Association's trends and developments report says that 40k rooms are due on stream by 2015 ... the Olympics are 'an incentive to complete projects'<br /></blockquote>Indeed they are. And next time, they'll be in a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRIC">BRIC economy</a> for the second time out of three (Beijing, China in 2008; <a href="http://news.google.co.uk/news/url?sa=t&amp;ct2=uk%2F0_0_s_2_1_aa&amp;usg=AFQjCNEqtVwEiQaXTD-zxlpipgdb-fzYHA&amp;sig2=dJ6AmRdF0NWkAo9piWHwgw&amp;cid=1444182380&amp;ei=HbjTSoiJCqChjAetyaaMAw&amp;rt=SEARCH&amp;vm=STANDARD&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Fsport%2F2009%2Foct%2F02%2Folympics-2016-rio-brazil">Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</a> in 2016).<br /><br /><i>* Page is a news round-up, so scroll down a bit to find the story.</i><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Now factor this in: oil production could peak by 2020</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/now-factor-this-in-oil-product.html" />
   <id>tag:www.travelweekly.co.uk,2009:/blogs//11.70272</id>
   
   <published>2009-10-08T09:30:11Z</published>
   <updated>2009-10-08T12:15:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There&apos;s much talk of sustainability as ABTA holds its Travel Convention, and the big piece of news on that front is the next stage of Forum for the Future&apos;s Tourism 2023 project. The sustainability charity has unveiled four possible futures...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Nathan Midgley</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Green debate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="5032" label="abta" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="94779" label="forum for the future" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="59894" label="oil price" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="94781" label="tourism 2023" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="94783" label="travel convention" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="94785" label="uk energy research centre" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/blogs/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There's much talk of sustainability as ABTA holds its <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/08/32053/travel-convention-2009.html">Travel Convention</a>, and the big piece of news on that front is the next stage of Forum for the Future's <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/08/32078/abta-2009-travel-giants-back-tourism-2023-project.html">Tourism 2023 project</a>.</p>
<p>The sustainability charity has unveiled <a href="http://www.travelweekly.co.uk/Articles/2009/10/08/32084/tourism-2023-four-scenarios-for-the-future-of-travel.html">four possible futures for the travel industry</a> should it fail to take action. There's also a <a href="http://www.forumforthefuture.org/files/Tourism_2023_full_report_web_version.pdf">60-odd-page report</a> to digest (pdf, 7MB).<br /><br />So while you're mulling over its projections add this to the mix: global oil production <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article6865557.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&amp;attr=1185799">could peak in the next 10 years</a>, according to the <a href="http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/tiki-index.php">UK Energy Research centre</a>.<br /><br />Ach, plenty of time...<br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
