UK industry leaders have hit out at British and EU officials’ failure to clarify post-Brexit travel issues, calling it a “disgrace”.
Deirdre Wells, chair of the Tourism Alliance, told an Abta briefing on Brexit and the Future of UK Travel in London: “It’s disgraceful that a few weeks from March 29 we still don’t have answers to all the questions customers are asking.”
She said: “People are making decisions [about travel]. If we get this wrong, it will be really damaging.”
Paul Carter, head of Hotelplan UK, warned: “Our operating model – the seasonal workers’ model – is under threat until a new system is in place.” He complained of a “vacuum of information” and said: “It shouldn’t be up to us to have to deal with that.”
Carter told the briefing in London: “Things could go down to the wire. I would be in favour of a delay.”
Abta head of public affairs Luke Petherbridge said: “An extension is increasingly likely.” But Wells warned: “If it’s only an extension without clarification it just means more uncertainty. We need clarity first.”
Carter noted: “The date is important from a tour operator perspective – June 30 would be in mid-season. September 30 would be the start of the ski season. October 30 would be better.”
Petherbridge said: “We’ve made progress on our key priorities. We have arrangements in place, both the UK and EU, to ensure people can continue to travel, and we have visa-free travel.
“Areas we’ve not had confirmed yet include [recognition of] European Health Insurance (Ehic) cards. [But] many [EU member states] have said privately the arrangements will be maintained.”
Brittany Ferries’ chief executive Christophe Mathieu said: “The government is extremely concerned about Dover and Folkestone.”
But he added: “I’m worried about checks not of passengers but of freight. The UK is not in Schengen [so passenger checks won’t change]. The volumes in Dover are so massive, we could almost benefit [at Portsmouth], but I would much rather a deal.”
Wells, chief executive of VisitKent, agreed: “There is real concern about how we’ll cope – 90% of UK freight, 22 million passengers a year and 12,000 lorries a day go through Kent. If there are 90-second checks on vehicles it will result very quickly in 17-mile tailbacks.
“In case of no deal it’s really a case of communications and logistics. But the biggest part of resilience is to be as welcoming and disruption-free as possible.”
Yet Wells said: “Two things give me encouragement. First, the government needs tourism more than ever. The industry has been through a hell of a lot and always finds a way to keep people moving. Second, it won’t do us any harm to try harder [and] it’s grist to the mill to say we need government support.”
Petherbridge insisted: “Any deal would be better than no deal.” But he warned a deal “would be the end of the beginning not the beginning of the end.
“Most of our priorities will only be agreed when we agree on the exit – so better a friendly exit than having to pick up the pieces after no deal.”
This is a community-moderated forum.
All post are the individual views of the respective commenter and are not the expressed views of Travel Weekly.
By posting your comments you agree to accept our Terms & Conditions.