THE white sand beaches and upmarket resorts of the Indian Ocean are the preserve of Hollywood’s glitterati and the Primrose Hill set, right? Wrong.
Fair enough, a holiday to Mauritius or the Seychelles is never going to be as cheap as a package to the Mediterranean, but there’s no reason why clients without bulging bank accounts can’t enjoy a break to these exotic locations.
In fact, the three-star and below sector is showing signs of growth – a fact not lost on operators such as Elite Vacations, which is extending its affordable options in the Indian Ocean for next year.
Elite managing director Peter Jackson said: “The region suffers from the perception people can’t afford to go there. We want to show clients they can afford it, that it can be done for £800.
“Our sales are 65%-70% for top-end properties and about 30% for the middle sector, but this latter market is growing.”
Travel 2 product manager Greg Young said: “Increased consumer and trade awareness is needed to promote the more affordable options.”
And these two operators are not alone. Somak Holidays head of product Rob Haynes said: “There is growth in the three-star market. About half of our sales are for the once-in-a-lifetime holiday, where clients want luxury. But the other half is for ordinary holidays, for families or couples wanting a good, value-for-money break.”
In 2005, 35% of Thomson’s Indian Ocean customers booked three-star or below. The operator said it’s seeing consistent sales for this sector, and it believes the luxury perception only applies to certain destinations.
A spokeswoman said: “People expect high prices in Mauritius and the Seychelles, but this is balanced by offerings in the Maldives. Charter operations to this destination have led the customer to expect lower prices. This has allowed the budget market to grow alongside more high-end products.”
Cosmos senior commercial manager Sara Gelder added: “Mauritius has a more exclusive feel to it; it is more expensive as it only offers scheduled flights. The Maldives is perceived as expensive but, being a charter destination, is more affordable.”
But does spending less mean lower quality, fewer facilities and poorer service? Not according to Elite’s Jackson. He said: “We have a three-star property in the Seychelles that is in our list of top-five best sellers and the quality is still very good. There may be a difference in the style of rooms and the number of facilities, but almost all are owner-managed. This means clients get a more traditional experience – something not always available from the internationally branded five-star resorts.
“As for Mauritius, the culture is very service-oriented, so clients get top-quality service regardless of whether they’re in a three star or five-star resort. Unless you want butler service, why pay for five star?”
Thomson agrees. “The lower-graded hotels have perfected affordable accommodation at a competitive price without jeopardising quality of service,” said the spokeswoman.
“These properties simply have fewer facilities and a more simplified product than the larger, luxury hotels.”
So, if your clients have less than £1,500 each and want to escape to the Indian Ocean, where will you send them? Six operators tell us their favourites:
Please email to report any offensive posts. Any post deemed to contravene the Travel Weekly forum guidelines will be removed.
Login/Register to add your comments
| Subject | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| There are currently no comments for this article. | ||